ӘДЕБИЕТТЕР:
1. Regier W.G. (2007). In praise of flattery.
- University of Nebraska Press, 2007. – 189 р.
2. Walzer A.E. Parrēsia, Foucault, and the Classical Rhetorical Tradition // Rhetoric Society
Quarterly, 2013. - №43(1). - Р. 1-21. doi: 10.1080/02773945.2012.740130
3. Landauer M. Parrhesia and the demos tyrannos: Frank speech, flattery and accountability
in democratic Athens // History of Political Thought, 2012. - №33(2). - Р. 185-208.
4. Gibson B. Managing the past: Plinian strategies in the panegyrici latini // Arethusa, 2013.
- №46(2). - Р. 217-240. doi: 10.1353/are.2013.0011
5. Maehler H. Pindar und die Tyrannen // Acta Antiqua Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae,
2011. - №51(1). - Р. 1-7. doi: 10.1556/aant.51.2011.1.1
6. Decosimo D. An umma of accountability Al-Ghaza¯li¯against domination // Soundings,
2015. - №98(3). - Р. 260-288. doi: 10.5325/soundings.98.3.0260
7. Holgado E.C. Non-verbal expressions as performative statements: Prepositional
constructions and emphatic appeals // Circulo de Linguistica Aplicada a la Comunicacion,
2016. - №66. - Р. 3-22. doi: 10.5209/CLAC.52767
8. Cavazza N. The tone dilemma: Comparing the effects of flattery and verbal aggression in
a political speech // Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 2017. -№36(5). - Р. 585-598.
doi: 10.1177/0261927X17698186
9. De Haan C., Andeweg B., Blokzijl W. You're the best: Ingratiation techniques in informative
presentations // SEFI 2005 Annual Conference: Engineering Education at the Cross-Roads of
Civilizations, 2005. Ankara, 7-10 September. – 112883. – Р. 207–213.
10. Kapust D.J. (2018). Flattery and the history of political thought: That glib and oily art. -
Cambridge
University Press, 2018. – 230 р.
11. Markovits E. As if we were codgers: Flattery, parrhēsia
and old man demos in
Aristophanes’ Knights // Polis, 2012. - №29(1). – Р. 108–129. doi: 10.1163/20512996-
90000198
80
&
№ 3 (75) 2022
Ғ Ы Л Ы М И - С А Р А П Т А М А Л Ы Қ Ж У Р Н А Л
&
12. Schneewind S. Beyond flattery: Legitimating political participation in a Ming
living shrine
// Journal of Asian Studies, 2013. - №72(2). - Р. 345-366. doi: 10.1017/
S0021911812002203
13. Llosasanz A. About dogs, wolves, snakes and roses: Berganza and the maske
of memory of momus // Anales Cervantinos, 2012. - №44. - Р. 159-172. doi: 10.3989/
anacervantinos.2012.008
14. Kapust D.J. The problem of flattery and Hobbes's institutional defense of monarchy //
Journal
of Politics, 2011. - №73(3). - Р. 680-691. doi: 10.1017/S0022381611000387
15. Fernández Mosquera S. Quevedo and his contribution: From Discurso de las privanzas
to Como ha de ser el privado // Bulletin of Spanish Studies, 2013. - №90(4-5). – Р. 551-576. doi:
10.1080/14753820.2013.802566
16. Burch L. A modest proposal: Reframing the frontispieces of Madeleine de Scudéry's
conversations (1680-1692)
// Seventeenth-Century French Studies, 2012. -№34(1). - Р.
52-67. doi: 10.1179/0265106812Z.0000000005
17. Cañete Quesada C. The rhetorics of flattery in the literature of Spanish exiles in the
Dominican Republic: The case of Enrique Lopez Alarcon // Hispanic Review, 2012. - №80(1). -
Р. 127-146. doi: 10.1353/hir.2012.0004
18. Viroli M. (2011). The liberty of servants: Berlusconi’s Italy. - Princeton University Press,
2011. – 178 р.
19. Yang J.
The politics of Pai Ma Pi: Flattery as
empty signifiers and social
control in a Chinese workplace // Social Semiotics, 2014. - №24(1). - Р. 1-18. doi:
10.1080/10350330.2012.752159
20. Keeves G.D., Westphal J.D., McDonald M.L. Those closest wield the sharpest knife: How
ingratiation leads to resentment and social undermining of the CEO // Administrative Science
Quarterly, 2017. - №62(3). - Р. 484-523. doi: 10.1177/0001839216686053
21. Cavazza N., Guidetti M. Captatio Benevolentiae: Potential risks and benefits of flattering
the audience in a public political speech // Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 2018.
- №37(6). – Р. 706-720. doi: 10.1177/0261927X18800132
22. Danziger R. The pragmatics of flattery: The strategic use of solidarity-oriented actions //
Journal of Pragmatics, 2020. - №170. – P. 413-425. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.09.027
23. Danziger R. The democratic king: The role of ritualized flattery in political discourse //
Discourse
and Society, 2021. - №32(6). - P. 645-665. doi: 10.1177/09579265211023224
24. Kahalon R., Shnabel N., Becker J.C. “Don’t bother your pretty little head”: Appearance
compliments lead to improved mood but impaired cognitive performance // Psychology of
Women Quarterly, 2018. - №42(2). – Р. 136-150. doi: 10.1177/0361684318758596